From the University of Michigan’s Law Review repository:
In Democratic Principle and Electoral College Reform, University of Michigan scholars Ethan J. Leib & Eli J. Mark argue that the Electoral College is a relic of a bygone age, and in conflict with the Constitution command of the Fourteenth Amendment, which dictates the doctrine of “One person, one vote”.
The authors write:
“Although states have the flexibility and authority under Article II of the
Constitution to award their electoral votes in different ways, under the current
system all but two states award their electoral votes in a “winner-take-all”
fashion, with no votes allocated to the statewide popular vote loser. This
scheme has dominated the electoral vote landscape since the rise of political
parties, and it presently enables presidential candidates to focus their campaigns
on a small percentage of voters from a tiny number of swing states
while disregarding the needs of the rest of the nation.”
Please note that the full text of the article opens as a PDF file which you may read here.